Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blahzay Blahzay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, Dlohcierekim has found evidence of meeting WP:BAND. Mango juice talk 18:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Blahzay Blahzay
This musical group fails WP:BAND. The speedy and prod tags were removed. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not a speedy because the discography section asserts notability. MER-C 12:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if |BLAHZAY&sql=11:9fq2g4sbtv4z~T5 Album Blah Blah Blah charted 22 on billboard according to allmusic. and 600 Googlehits for "Blahzay Blahzay" review signify. :) Dlohcierekim 19:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - not sure about this one. According to WP:AFDP and WP:BAND, "Bands ... are notable if they have released two albums on a notable label (e.g. not self-released)". My question, as person who has never delved into music labels much at all (I just like listening) is "does this band fufill this requirement regarding notable labels?". If someone could interpret the article/extra sources and give me a determination of this, I'd be happy to cast my opinion one way or another. I've watched this page so that, if someone answers the above, I can alter my opinion one way or another. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 05:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.