Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaine Trump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Blaine Trump

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't pass WP:GNG; only merits a passing mention in her ex-husband Robert Trump's biography, unless he gets deleted too for lack of independent notability from his famous brother… — JFG talk 07:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't pass WP:GNG and I think Robert Trump will end up being deleted too --Bennyaha (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Strong Keep - When somebody is related to somebody else more famous there is a often a rush to delete. Though it is has been mentioned. she is not a brief mention, she is the active vice chair of an important charity God's Love We Deliver, which brings meals to homebound people with serious illnesses. Therein unlike the proposed cuts fo the meals for wheels program by he EX Brother in Law) as well as a fashion icon from her days in the spotlight. The article on Blaine Trump prexists the article on Robert and should not be contingent upon it.Masterknighted (talk) 10:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect - Unless more notable events supported by reliable sources allow editors to expand significantly the article. Is probably better mentioned as part of another Trump-related article otherwise.  PaleoNeonate (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have amended my vote to suggest redirecting to the main Trump person or family article. PaleoNeonate (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment - Blaine it on the nameMasterknighted (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC) Masterknighted (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG. Subject of dedicated profile stories in People Magazine and the New York Times plus a shorter piece on Curbed. Her divorce was separately covered in New York Magazine. Article is a stub, but stub-status does not preclude notability. DarjeelingTea (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Masterknighted DarjeelingTea. It feels a bit odd that a presidential brother is less notable than his ex-wife, but she apparently likes the limelight, while he doesn't. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the Trump family article. Subject only appears in some sources because of her marriage, not for anything she has personally done. This is weaker than Donald Trump. ValarianB (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Trump family article, article's subject isn't notable enough to have their own article. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that Articles for deletion/Robert Trump closed as redirect.
 * Keep Dedicated profile in the New York Times nearly always means notable, saying she only gets them because of her husband is troubling aswell. passes WP:GNG which is all that matters. GuzzyG (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think this discussion is much more different than the Afd for Robert Trump. Blaine receives more coverage based on her own merits, not her relation to the Trump name.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Coverage of her own merits could aptly be mentioned in her charity's page God's Love We Deliver, and the article could possibly redirect there. The puff piece in Women's Wear Daily does not equate mainstream coverage. — JFG talk 10:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.