Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Alma (TV Host)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Blake Alma (TV Host)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Creator bypassed AfC nomination process after numerous failed attempts to prove notability. This article is also to circumvent the salting of Blake Alma, a 2013 attempt at creation.  Wylie pedia  23:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Wylie  pedia  23:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  J  947  (c · m)  00:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - Too many blogs cited in the article, which are not reliable secondary sources. The hunting magazine article is encouraging, but doesn't quite push it over the line of notability for me. Seems WP:TOOSOON. Avoiding the normal Wikipedia processes is also disconcerting. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete – I have come to the same conclusion as Indy beetle: a classic case of TOOSOON. Blogs are mixed with RS in the article and notability is not quite established. finds a lot of coverage, but it is mainly concentrated in OutdoorHub (is it reliable?) and even then only across a short time period. Due to him being active in many different areas redirecting would be biased towards one aspect of his career. I would post a more detailed rationale and investigate his noteworthiness further if I were off mobile.  J  947  (c · m)  00:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough reliable sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the same reasons why I declined at AFC.Tvx1 16:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a teenager with a PR campaign. I don't see any references that establish notability, or any claim that WP:NAUTHOR or WP:ENT are met. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 16:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write)  02:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.