Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Harper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Blake Harper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the sources are very poor and unreliable: 1) is an interview so it doesn't count for proving notability, 2) is a mention related to porn awards (porn awards do not count for proving notability since pornbio was deprecated), 3) it is the winner list of a porn prize, see n.2, 4)IMDb it is not reliable, 5) same interview that in 1, 6) his name doesn't even appear in the page (nor stage name nor real name). I looked for more sources but I couldn't find any. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG with sources in article, and also as a subject of the documentary Naked Fame. I've never seen an article nominated before that exists in 10 other languages! User:Johnpacklambert how doesn't this] establish notability along with the documentary? Nfitz (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG/WP:BASIC notability requires non-trivial coverage from reliable, independent secondary sources. The nominator's assessment of the article's sources is correct. None of them qualify.  The above link is an interview (primary source) in a blog (unreliable source). RS coverage for Naked Fame itself is thin, and Harper's coverage there is even thinner.  As for other editions of Wikipedia, they have their own notability guidelines and many simply translate from en.Wikipedia.  Multiple of the other language articles for the subject appear to be such translations, while others don't even cite sources. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:BASIC per the nominator's assessment and my comments above. No strong claim for passing WP:ENT without independent RS support. An independent search for sources failed to yield substantial RS coverage. RS coverage is mainly focused on the subject's partner instead, and notability is not inherited. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.