Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake O'Leary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Blake O&

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. does not qualify because of 1 TV role. in any case he gets a mention in the character Ben Kirk's article. nothing really in gnews on this person. LibStar (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with the 1 TV role.Polarpanda (talk) 12:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment You'd think that his being in 214 episodes of Neighbours from 2007 through 2009 would have generated some sort of press... but then, Australian actors and productions rarely get searchable coverage unless they do something in the U.S. or UK.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * google news does include all major Australian newspapers. LibStar (talk) 01:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed, it does not. Could you advise what database might?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah. My own research has found Web Wombat, Google Australia, and Colossus. We'll see if I can get lucky.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * you could try google for domains: abc.net.au, smh.com.au , news.com.au LibStar (talk) 07:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * More homework? I do appreciate the leads, thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 00:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable enough. - Shiftchange (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: Well, I've done the homework - all thirty seconds of it - and, as it happens, there are zero hits on Google Australia's News for "Blake O'Leary" + Neighbours, as well as zero hits for O'Leary without any additional search terms on the current month. I believe this is a case - as, indeed, all AfDs theoretically are - where the burden of proof is on anyone wishing to retain the article.    Ravenswing  13:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.