Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Stevenson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Blake Stevenson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To get around the common name, I ran searches for information on "Blake Stevenson" in conjunction with either "domestic yeti" or "low latency", and found nearly nothing in the way of coverage that would meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Appears not to meet the notability criteria for inclusion. The sources cited in the article are all affiliated. Largoplazo (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete no sources found beyond the two CNET ones in article (which are not really sources). GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything in independent RSes. Fails the GNG and WP:ARTIST. --Vexations (talk) 22:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, i wish Stevenson well in his endeavours but WP is not here for promotional purposess, nothing found relevant to WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO (gsearched "Blake Stevenson ontario"). Coolabahapple (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Except for the CNET footnotes this is otherwise sourced to blogs and podcasts, not reliable sources — and since he's a contributor to CNET, not an outside party getting covered by CNET, even the CNET footnotes don't assist. And no, nothing stated in the body text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.