Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Whitney Thompson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Blake Whitney Thompson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of an anonymous editor, whose rationale (from the talk page) is included verbatim below. On the merits, I make no recommendation - except to note that there are severe problems with the few references that are present. One ref about an award goes to the subject's website, for example. That's a concern. Note also that the first AFD closed in January 2012 as no consensus. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I nominated this for deletion, but I'm not a registered user, so can't move the process forward. This page is clearly self-promotional, and the man is not notable. 64.206.234.106 (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Nemo
 * Delete. Not genuinely notable, and the coverage is largely of the related company not the subject himself. See also the discussion at Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard where somebody, apparently the subject, requests deletion. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 22:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does not meet WP:BIO, insufficient sources to demonstrate notability. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be a relatively minor real estate developer with little coverage of himself as a person at all, and no non-perfunctory coverage of his developments and proposals. More to the point - never got any mention in NYT or the other major sources one would expect. Collect (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete BIOSPAM ukexpat (talk) 20:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note The IP who asserts identity with the person who is the subject of the BLP appears to be acting as "owner" of this BLP, which does not make me comfortable with anything other than a "Snow Delete" result - Wikipedia should not be used as a personal advertising medium. Alas. Collect (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Run of the mill coverage of a property developer deemed noteworthy because of his age. This touches upon the concept of ONEEVENT. Possibly a NOT YET situation. Carrite (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Perhaps simply not enough solidly convincing coverage overall. SwisterTwister   talk  05:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.