Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blame sydney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Blame sydney

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Creating this AfD discussion on behalf of a user for whom it appears Twinkle broke. I assume the rationale is along the lines of "fails notability criteria." &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 21:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete - I'm the guy Kuyabribri jumped in for, and yes, it's "fails notability criteria" per WP:BAND - the two articles sourced are from a school publication, the band has no released music, so no chart success, no substantial airplay, and so forth. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Questions - Couldn't this be included since its a band related to a Major University. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.26.220.195 (talk) 23:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non notable band, does not meet any of the notability criteria at WP:N or WP:BAND. To IP above - notability is not inherited.  The band must be notable in and of itself. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.