Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blank, Blank, Blank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Contrived. Tone 09:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Blank, Blank, Blank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My WP:BEFORE doesn't turn anything up besides music track listings, Amazon, and this article. See also my reasoning at Articles for deletion/Contrived for my AfD of the band that created this. Hog Farm (talk) 04:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unlike the band, whose sourcing problems are repairable, this album doesn't really have a very strong notability claim per WP:NALBUMS. Once upon a time, our only notability test for albums was that they were verifiable as existing — as long as the band had an article, every album in their discography was automatically a valid candidate for its own standalone article too just because a notable band had recorded it. That's not the notability test for albums anymore, however; for an album to warrant a separate article in 2019, we have to be able to say and source a lot more than just the fact that it exists. But for this album, that's really not possible. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Contrived as this could be a viable search term for someone interested in this album and band and it is already listed in the discography section. I would not completely oppose a deletion, but I always go for a redirect on the off-chance that someone actually types this in the search bar to look for it. Aoba47 (talk) 04:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.