Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blank Banshee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Blank Banshee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clear notability issues, self-published outputs only. Semitransgenic talk. 22:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)'
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Semitransgenic  talk. 22:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging AfC commenters, , }, , interested subject user and also tagger .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The only time I've ever touched this article at all was within an automated tagging run for a routine maintenance issue, which does not mean I necessarily have any special insight to contribute to the discussion. I'm really losing patience with getting 20+ pings per day from you on AFD discussions where I usually have nothing to offer, to be perfectly frank — just because I once bumped into it in an uncategorized tagging run in AWB doesn't automatically make me an "interested subject". Bearcat (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * First of all, I sense unnecessary tension from that message and "20" is exaggerated. Second, I also pinged you as you're a Canadian music fan so you may've wanted to comment. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources to withhold the notability of the subject, fails WP:BIO.— UY Scuti Talk  15:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - They get a nice mention in this article, but only a couple of other trivial mentions at News. Nothing at all at Newspapers, Books, or Highbeam. Three trivial mentions at Scholar of all places.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The artist just doesn't appear notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.