Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blarghasm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE.  Rob e  rt  T 02:28, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Blarghasm
Delete neologism, near-nonsense. --Trovatore 03:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * This is a perfectly fine word :o you are just to old to comprehend Trovatore! (preceding unsigned comment by 03:56, 31 October 2005)
 * Delete per nomination. Saberwyn 05:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just delete. -- Captain Disdain 08:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Personally, this is sad that people would be wandering this place deleting words that might be nonsense. By the way, have you guys ever though about deleting fo-shizzle? or any other slang wordage? When the Oxford English Dictionary has those kinds of words in it, then why fight this one too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.120.233.193 (talk • contribs) 2005-10-31 15:48:35 UTC
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary, of slang or otherwise. It is an encyclopaedia.  If you wish to work on a dictionary, Wiktionary is over there.  Note that, just like the OED, Wiktionary attempts to be a dictionary of language as it actually exists and has attestation criteria that must be satisfied before accepting something as a word.  If you wish to work on a project with no such criteria, and wish to just invent new words and new meanings of your own, then UrbanDictionary is the place. Uncle G 16:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dalbury 16:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tedernst 18:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as part of "War on Portmanteaux" --MacRusgail 21:22, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Sensor 01:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Failing that delete as unverifiable and unencyclopedic. The Land 18:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.