Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blason

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 21:05, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

Blason
According to this page, blason is a minor literary term. Google yields some 400 hits on this while only 1 link I could see got any reference. Inter 19:21, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. It was a common literary device in Elizabethan lyric poetry, eg. teeth like pearls, lips like coral. Megan1967 05:49, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. As it stands this is a substub dicdef at best. I don't doubt that it could be a decent article if the author had done a proper job of it, but unless someone expands it slightly this is not worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Trilobite (Talk) 10:02, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. This article could indeed use vast improvements, but could indeed be made a valid article.  The content here would still remain useful for someone who wished to write a better one.  -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:41, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Cleaned up and expanded. Also added term blason populaire. Megan1967 08:16, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, nice work Kappa 02:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.