Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blasphemy of Faith

Blasphemy of Faith
Blasphemy of Faith was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

A completely non-notable religious satire. Google turned up 4 hits on this phrase, none of which corresponded to the article. Original author didn't respond to queries concerning source. --BM 22:27, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * hmm, it's too short to be a copyvio, makes much more sense than most theology, but surely there's a theologians around who know of a proper name for it? tentative keep Dunc|&#9786; 22:55, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. In addition to there being no evidence of notability, since no source for this is cited, it is probably original research.  Of it could be Usenet-cruft.  --BM 23:10, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Opinionated and not notable. Megan1967 23:34, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's pretty much a restatement of Transcendental Argument for the Non-existence of God iMeowbot~Mw 00:07, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given above. Fire Star 03:46, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Not so much satire as poorly-developed original research. Delete. AlexTiefling 10:21, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.