Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaster Bates (drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Blaster Bates (drink)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No explanation why this drink is notable, or even if it exists. Since its creation in 2007, the article has consisted only of a recipe and has been pretty much completely unsourced. Already twice deleted via PROD in 2006. This should finally be deleted. J I P &#124; Talk 11:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I can find sources to suggest that it exists but none of them look like RS to me. I'm not sure if maybe there is some decent coverage offline somewhere?    Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The first source isn't even consistent with the two others, it claims the drink is alcoholic. J I P  &#124; Talk 12:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree, the sources are terrible. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete could be moved to Wikitext or wherever they store cookbooks in the larger Wiki universe. Nothing of note to be kept here. Oaktree b (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I found a singular source from Oshkosh Northwestern with the listed name and ingredients. It doesn't seem to be particiularly notable but I'm unsure how it has gone from Cheshire to Wisconsin if that is a correct statement in the article. FozzieHey (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; didn't find good sources either. ~EdGl talk 21:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wholly non-notable; a relic of Wikipedia's worst years.  RobinCarmody (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources to support its notability. Luciapop (talk) 10:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:SIGCOV. That's all. Bearian (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.