Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blatz (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, consensus is that the article does meet the WP:MUSIC notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Blatz (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources to establish notability or verifiability. Fails WP:MUSIC. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guest9999 (talk) 13:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep meets WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 16:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above, with multiple releases on Lookout Records.  Lugnuts  (talk) 16:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep though the article is of poor quality and contains largely original research the ban appears to be notable. The article needs to be cleaned up and possible stubified to concentrate on essential info. -- neon white talk 17:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Meets 1 of the criteria set out at the relevant notability guideline (WP:MUSIC) but contains unverified information that needs reliable sources to assert that it's not original research and meets WP:NPOV. Seraphim&hearts;  Whipp  12:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.