Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlazetheMaster

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:04, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

BlazetheMaster
Vanity page for someone's online gaming alias Cnwb 22:28, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Leave it, It is historically accurate. --unsigned vote by 24.45.233.85, who has six edits.


 * keephm blaze pointed me here and it is helpful.. i think its useful and want to see him add stuff to make it better :) --unsigned vote by 24.28.123.143, who has ten edits.


 * I agree, Leave it as its a good learning tool for any age of empire gamer. --unsigned vote by 24.56.204.172, whose sole edit is this vote.


 * Good stuff. Leave it. --unsigned vote by 80.99.13.211, whose sole edit is this vote.


 *  Note : 24.45.233.85 deleted the reason I listed for deletion (vanity page). Also, all voters thus far are non-registered users. Cnwb 23:22, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete if possible and block the talking hosiery. They never learn, do they? - Lucky 6.9 23:28, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy. And I'd encourage the person writing this to go over Wikibooks and write their strategy guide there. Wikibooks actually might want it. :) -- Bobdoe (Talk) 23:31, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. /s&#618;zl&#230;k  &#762;/  23:33, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * DONT DELETE _ Very accurate reference, historically significant, Re: Criminal sect 3344.21 sub section 453 -- unsigned comment by 24.45.233.85, moved from VfD log page. Note that 24.45.233.85 already cast a vote.
 * Delete. Not encyclopedically notable.  Wikipedia is not here to be a strategy guide.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:56, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gaming alias != notable. DaveTheRed 01:18, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the socks want it kept, then it can't be worth keeping! Miss Pippa 18:09, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, sock supported. Jayjg (talk)  19:18, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable in any way (an online gamers call sign could only be conceivably notable if they were one of these professional gamers playing at tournaments around the world). Has there every been any article supported by socks that was worth keeping? You want to write this stuff, get your own webpage. Average Earthman 11:26, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Infrogmation 20:15, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- "historically accurate"?! Zetawoof 11:07, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.