Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blazing Lizard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The article can be created again when the company becomes notable.  Singu larity  01:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Blazing Lizard

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy deletion (as spam), I don't think it qualifies there, but I also don't think it's a notable company at this point.  Citi Cat   ♫ 05:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Keep. It is an up and coming company that will soon have more notariety it has alredy recieved press interest from big gaming magazines and the article will simply be created again in the futre when the game is released.
 * Delete - per nom. Not notable at the moment. --H| H irohisat  Talk 06:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete again a non-notable little company that hasn't proven itself.Balloonman 06:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There are some google results, but they look to be mostly press releases. Possibly once they release a game notability will be established. --Chuck Sirloin 12:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, four-month-old company that hasn't actually released a game yet. NawlinWiki 15:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:N, more specifically WP:CORP. Even though it is contested, it would still consider speedy deleting it, per WP:CSD. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 16:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It won't be notable until it releases a game. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a developer started by three veteran employees of established developer Volition, Inc., and its first game's (Pirates vs Ninjas Dodgeball) page on Gamespot indicates that Microsoft is publishing it. I feel the game itself also has some cultural significance, though I'm sure you'll disagree. --RoadDoggFL 02:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.