Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blazing Rate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 03:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Blazing Rate

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Thoroughbred horse that's only stated claim to notability was beating another non-notable horse in a non-notable race. A read-through at the article itself should convince any skeptic. CastAStone//(talk) 04:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable outside sources to verify notability. Master of Puppets Care to share?  04:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * There is clearly one reliable outside source and it is in the article. And I just added a second. --SmashvilleBONK! 06:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication that the race he won or the horse he beat is notable outside of horseracing enthusiasts. Lankiveil (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep. If we deleted any article which is not "notable outside of X enthusiasts", there would not be many left. Looks reasonably notable to me, I don't see any reason to delete. --Zvika (talk) 05:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * On the Fence Delete...I am of the opinion that a horse needs to win a graded stakes race (or be Zippy Chippy) to be considered notable. However, reliable sources do exist - one was in the article...for the record, In Summation won this year's Bing Crosby Handicap...not even remotely not notable. --SmashvilleBONK! 06:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough. The sport of thoroughbred horse riding doesn't gain anything with the article.   WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  we need to talk.  &bull; 15:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree that the horse didn't prove to do anything notable enough on the track or in the breeding shed.(Keycap (talk) 01:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.