Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleach media and materials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-10 20:22Z 

Bleach media and materials

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A long cluttered list of Bleach information that is much better suited for a fan wiki. RobJ1981 00:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Part of an article series, but I don't see any particular policy problems with the lists nor does the nominator cite any. Voice actor sections should be removed as they should be included with the character descriptions, per guidelines by WP:ANIME. But overall, my impression of this nomination is the result of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. --Farix (Talk) 00:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep media and release information is encyclopedic, and the title refers to the theme songs and episode lists and such. It's better to have it in one place than in a bunch of different ones. JuJube 01:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep As much as I don't like it, it's better to have this one article then have a bunch of others like JuJube said. Can you imagine how many AFDs all those would be?--M8v2 02:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, fancrufty, but the equivalent of many N discography articles. --Dhartung | Talk 07:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for lists, it is meant to be an encyclopedia of relevant information - with respect: this isn't. Telly   addict Editor review! 16:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * And exactly what policy are you citing? Clearly lists are permissible, otherwise, Wikipedia wouldn't have Featured Lists nor have established guidelines on lists. --Farix (Talk) 18:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ab e g92 contribs 19:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my WP:JUSTAVOTE above. As far as I can see, this is a major enterprise, and there's a lot of stuff related to it. Ab e g92 contribs 22:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep If anything, there is significant precedent for this in other anime pages, as well as music pages. Bleach is a very popular and significant work; while some anime may not warrant such pages, Bleach is a huge industry that has wide recognition. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 20:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Whilst aware of the whole snowball/heck business I do want to say that I feel we have far too many lists. WMMartin 18:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Even though I hate things like episode articles and many character articles, but the majority of these lists are ok, even if most people don't care about the subject matter. "Far too many lists"? As much as I hate to admit it, a lot of silly stuff has impact on our world where a lot of people made it and even more watched it, and markets formed around it. These lists are hardly the major concern for cruft cutting, anyways. -- Ned Scott 01:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. We don't need to know every single somewhat related song/ whatever to Bleach, but most of this stuff is fine. Although, a good lot of it could easily be merged into other articles rather than independently listed. -- Ned Scott 01:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Bleach is very popular, and most of this is pretty much important. &mdash; ♥ Tohru Honda13  ♥ 01:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per List of RahXephon media and other featured media lists. They can be sourced. They can be pretty.  These things are moved to secondary pages because of readability size limits.  Try using clean-up tags.  --Kunzite 00:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.