Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleep Bloop Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Bleep Bloop Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No signed notable artists, the two "blue links" are to completely unrelated topics. No sources in article, and none found. Rather promotional. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP. It certainly does not help that none of the artists is notable... Ceosad (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as only consisting of its own clients, no actual information beyond that, and nothing to suggest there would be enlarged significance from improvements, because there isn't even any to begin with. SwisterTwister   talk  00:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable.  → Call me  Razr   Nation  08:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP And Adoil Descended (talk) 13:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.