Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blended artists community bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Blended artists community bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organisation in Bangladesh. I couldn't find any independent references for it (in English language media). I had a look at the Twitter account (13 followers) and Facebook page (10 likes) which makes me feel this is not notable at all. The article seems to be written by an editor with a conflict of interest. I first thought of tagging it as G11 but then decided to AfD it in case non-English language references exist and the article is improved in the meantime. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * delete of no value in present form — billinghurst  sDrewth  14:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete was probably supposed to be "Blender artists community Bangladesh", not "Blended artists community bangladesh". A non-notable user group for users of Blender (software). Mduvekot (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I myself frankly nearly speedy tagged and I would've also explored PROD, however, considering chances are there will be attempts at restarting this, it's best deleted altogether as there's by far nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  20:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.