Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blender Magazine's 500 Greatest Songs Since Your Were Born


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. (Will move to fix title.) &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 19:41, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Blender Magazine's 500 Greatest Songs Since Your Were Born
possible copyvio. 202.156.6.62 13:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, like 100 Greatest Britons. Kappa 14:33, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. &mdash; J I P | Talk 14:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Why is this article up for deletion? What's wrong with it? (unsigned vote by User:Street walker)
 * Delete. The article appears to be an entirely arbitrary list, originally compiled by a limited number of magazine journalists, with "greatest" grossly mis-defined as "the one we like the most". Sliggy 15:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete also, what's with the title? "Since Your Were Born"? It looked like a simple typo, but it's repeated in the article too.  Hmm. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  15:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Dottore So 19:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV list. Joelito 19:38, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Your were born? Who are Your? Two Halves, not sigged in
 * Keep There is a list of the 500 best songs as picked by Rolling Stone. Why not this? OmegaWikipedia 20:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Here is the list of songs picked by Rolling Stone at List of Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time. If that can stay, then this needs to stay, or else delete both, but be consistent. OmegaWikipedia 20:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per OmegaWikipedia (but move to correct spelling) &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. don't forget to contribute to Centralized discussion/Lists of songs &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per OmegaWikipedia; precedent has been set with the Rolling Stone list. As long as the magazine is a notable one (and Blender is) I can't see why this list can't stay. POV doesn't apply because this list is cited in a magazine and is not the article writer's opinion. 23skidoo 02:45, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but Move to proper spelling, per Wahoofive. Xoloz 08:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Gamaliel 03:49, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.