Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blimey


 * Discussion from Votes for deletion:

dicdef of a slang term -- Graham :) | Talk 11:48, 28 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Blimey! not enough good enough for Wiktionary Dunc Harris | Talk 12:26, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Stone the crows, guv'ner! I've expanded this a bit to see if it deserves to stay. DJ Clayworth 16:45, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I think it actually might have enough now to make it as a stub. The origins of the word bit is nicely encyclopædic.  blankfaze | &#9835 17:26, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Certainly worth being in the Wiktionary, at least. Not sure about being in Wikipedia though. Average Earthman 18:05, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Current content definitely belongs in Wiktionary. Dictionaries traditionally describe a word's origins.  I see no obvious way to ever expand this orphaned article past the definition, though.  Wiktionary and delete . Rossami 18:38, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary. Agreed w/ Rossami. Wile E. Heresiarch 19:54, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * As above. Lev 18:55, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to wiktionary. Thue 19:15, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * On second thought, redirect to Minced oaths. Thue 20:12, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Good redirect, but also recommend sending the current version to Wiktionary. Rossami 21:20, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I don't think Minced oaths describes blimey at all. I was very confused at the link when I first looked it up, as there is no reference at all. Stupidone0 05:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)