Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Beauty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Blind Beauty

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promo page about non-existent novel. Henry Merrivale (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per absence of reliable sources to demonstrate that this work even exists let alone to prove any notability. nancy  (talk) 07:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BK and WP:COI - the article is by the book's author, whose autobiographical article (also up for AfD here) says that he is still writing it. JohnCD (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, given the utter lack of sources, at best the novel is hyper-obscure and thus non-notable, at worst this is a hoax. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice for recreation once it is published and gets noted by reviewers, which is our definition of notability. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As an adendum, WP:BK is the relevant guideline here. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.