Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Divine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Blind Divine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not satisfy WP:BAND. Only reliable, third-party sources that I could find were Tucson Weekly and Phoenix New Times; the latter one only features trivial mention. The former one is an album review, but I don't think it would be enough to establish notability. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 08:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - Yeah, these are the only half-decent sources I found. Although the first one is not decent at all since it's just a trivial mention. The latter one is decent, it's reliable since it's an album review, but that's just one good source and one is not enough. Google search results are the standard databases, streaming service entries, lyrics sites, concert sites and blogs, with these two sources included. I am not convinced of their notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete apart from the notability issue this article is very promotional to the extent that it would qualify for speedy deletion G11 as spam, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.