Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Faith (Legend Seven album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.  An as  talk? 22:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Blind Faith (Legend Seven album)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominated for deletion as an album by a seemingly non-notable band. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are about (1) the band and (2) the other album by this band:

--Vox Humana 8' 04:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Legend Seven is notable; full-length albums by notable bands qualify as notable. Chubbles 05:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete album - WP:MUSIC states that albums must have independent coverage in them. I cant find anything about it on a google search Corpx 07:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Is that a new policy? In that case, we have tens of thousands of album pages to delete. If that (thoroughly silly) policy is to be followed, the track listing of the album should at least be Merged into the band page. By the way, Google isn't going to turn up any press for a 15-year old Christian Rock album. That's a bad standard to judge notability for albums. Back issues of CCM Magazine will, though. Chubbles 08:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Full text of Notability (music) Albums section:
 * "If the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage.


 * Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article, space permitting."
 * Corpx, what are you basing your claim on? --Oakshade 16:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The individual albums should have indepenent coverage part. I see no reviews/billboard chartings etc for this album Corpx 17:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * "Should" and "must" are very different. Where's the "must"? --Oakshade 17:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The album had three hit singles on Christian radio. Chart positions are now sourced. Sheesh. Chubbles 17:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a notable group. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 10:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Release by notable Christian rock band on Word Records, the Christian sub-label of Warner Music Group. Why is this in the "places and transportation" catagory? --Oakshade 16:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Chubbles, who makes persuasive arguments here. -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 02:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, album was notable, released on major label and had several radio hits, and videos. Thief12 00:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.