Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Hunger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 00:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Blind Hunger

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet criteria of WP:NBOOK; I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  15:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Two unique book reviews have been added voicing their own thoughts and opinions on the book. [The book has been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the book itself.[3] This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and' reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary.'] MaxBoothIII (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Bram Stoker award recommendation link inserted MaxBoothIII (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

An additional unique book review has been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abnergoodwin (talk • contribs) 19:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC) — Abnergoodwin (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep I feel this book now meets criteria #1 of WP:NBOOK. If it wins the award it is nominated for, then criteria #2 will have been satisfied.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The reviews cited in the article all seem pretty minor and I can't find anything other than minor website reviews for this book--no newspapers or magazines at all, and nothing Wikipedia considers notable.  Google news doesn't return anything.  I think the book might be worthy for inclusion if it wins the Stoker award it's apparently been nominated for, but we shouldn't keep articles based on what might happen in the future.  Rnb  (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Rnb. IMHO, notability is not established by quoting book reviews (every book gets reviewed). -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.