Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blindfire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Blindfire

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This entry has been unsourced for over a decade. Sure, a Google search shows the concept exists, but I'm not really finding reputable journalistic secondary coverage to justify keeping this article at this time. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I have heard about it, but no good sources to back it up. So unless this gets a good source it's a delete. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 17:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Transwikify to Wiktionary.★Trekker (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see zero good sources that support this definition, styled as a single word.  Original editor was an an SPA named "Blindfire".  An Ngram shows a peak of usage circa 1976 related to a British missile targeting system, but nothing promising otherwise.  This seems very much made up one day.  --Lockley (talk) 04:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.