Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinklist

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 22:55, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Blinklist
Duplicate Sleepyhead 12:56, 2 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with BlinkList. --Sleepyhead 10:59, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Wasn't there a VfD discussion here earlier? Why is it deleted? --Sleepyhead 10:59, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It wasn't deleted. It was ignored, probably because you didn't put a section header on the discussion page or transclude the discussion page into any per-day page.  i.e. You didn't properly perform all of the steps for nominating an article for deletion, so only those editors who had actually read the article were even aware of the nomination. Uncle G 14:26:11, 2005-09-02 (UTC)
 * Delete Chunitaku 14:04, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion is not the place for dealing with duplicate articles, such as this. duplicate articles is.  Uncle G 14:26:11, 2005-09-02 (UTC)
 * Delete this and BlinkList. The articles appear to be adverts and neither assert nor demonstrate notability. Naturenet | Talk 10:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Naturenet: even social bookmarking does not suggest that this item is notable. -- llywrch 19:31, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.