Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blipvert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Blipvert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

nn neologism. - üser:Altenmann >t 22:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. I can source that this was an important part of the Max Headroom franchise and has achieved some degree of use outside of it (for example:, , , ), but this belongs in an article about  Max Headroom and its legacy.  The problem is we don't have an article about the franchise as a whole, only individual articles about the various US/UK shows.  If someone can think of a decent place to redirect/merge this, I think that'd be the best solution. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, no need to merge for not only is it a fixture of Max Headroom but it is an advertising concept and belongs in that Wikipedia topic-well as well. Randy Kryn 16:02, 26 June 2016

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I did some more searches and found further coverage:  and  from The Guardian,  from Advertising Age,  from the Los Angeles Times, and  from Vulture.com.  These aren't as in-depth as I'd like, but they do add up to some kind of notability when combined with the previous hits I listed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.