Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockparty (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Blockparty
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No coverage in reliable third-party sources to establish notability. Kelly hi! 17:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No independent media coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge to Notacon per apparent failure to meet WP:GNG. -- Trevj (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- The coverage here does not seem to be independent. I don't see how this passes WP:GNG. Hoppingalong (talk) 22:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.