Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlogDay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:25, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

BlogDay
not notable. Added this to list of blogging terms, so we can delete this now Skrewler 02:49, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is barely notable to begin with, and certainly doesn't deserve an article. --Timecop 03:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It stinks. -- Femmina 05:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have to agree with the trolls that this can be covered on the list of blogging terms article, or in Blog. - Randwicked 07:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Dottore So 08:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some evidence is provided that demonstrates notability, of course. Pathetic Google, nothing in news. -  brenneman (t) (c)  11:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above --Depakote 12:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, if it's a real term, to list of blogging terms. That's what we do with merges, remember? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * True, but if it's not a commonly used term, it shouldn't go in the list. - brenneman (t) (c)  13:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for now per nom, it can always be added back later if it gains notability. -- Locke Cole  ( talk )  (e-mail) 08:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.