Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlogMe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

BlogMe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this programming language. Joe Chill (talk) 21:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see anything else notable about it. Shadowjams (talk) 09:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete WP:BURDEN, tell me if this changes. Miami33139 (talk) 01:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:N fail and a lack of WP:RS. Dale 02:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced. Alexius08 (talk) 03:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No reliable sources = no article.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and no reliable sources suggesting otherwise. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.