Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog Templates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-23 08:42Z 

Blog Templates

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see any purpose to this article. The concept of templating is not unique to blogs. This doesn't seem to be about anything in particular. Also, the article is unreferenced, making it more difficult to discern its purpose. ~ Booya Bazooka 00:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I was searching on Wiki about blog templates and could not find any information about them, so i decided to add some info. I should have added references which i have done now. If you still feel this article is not so important you can delete it.--Inhook 02:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * *Comment You might wish to use Google for searches like that. An article like this is akin to Mitten colors. --Action Jackson IV 04:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I might understand an article on MySpace blog templates, or LiveJournal template history. (Not guaranteed to be notable, but hey, it could happen). But something this vague and general... not quite. - grubber 17:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yuser31415 01:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yuser31415 01:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. It would be like an article about punctuation in magazines.  Templates are universally used, and nothing unique to blogs.   This kind of information belongs on a blog developer website, not in WP. Jerry lavoie 02:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * delete misleading and no sources.--Sefringle 05:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable concept. Maxamegalon2000 06:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --K.Z      Talk  •   Vandal   •  Contrib  07:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:RS. PeaceNT 09:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails WP:RS and WP:NOT. Telly   addict Editor review! 13:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.  BIGNOLE    (Question?)  (What I do)  17:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.