Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog meta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Blog meta


Two problems with this one: WP:DICDEF and the fact that it's used by a total of 1 person in the whole world (the article author). No relevant google hits, no sources, no references, and a dicdef. delete. timecop 16:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom -- Whpq 17:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom --Simonkoldyk 17:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - or Speedy Delete. confusing. page is a single sentence. - Femmina 19:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --- RockMFR 23:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Amanduhh 03:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- just a dictionary definition. If you could establish that it's actually used by people you could maybe argue for a transwiki, but it does not belong here. Reyk  YO!  06:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.