Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blokes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If userification is desired ping me. The Bushranger One ping only 00:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Blokes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

A film that apparently didn't make a splash upon its 2012 release hasn't been released yet. According to IMDb, the director and stars have no other credits, which probably accounts for the lack of notice. Not to be confused with the 2010 Chilean short film. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per being TOOSOON. To quote from the article "Blokes is an upcoming Australian film". Okay. The article's sole source Cairns Post, states "Blokes movie filming in Far North" and this was from December 2009. I did find another from December 2009 in North Queensland Register again sharing that it was filming at that time: "NQ blokes star in real Aussie film". And his sponser "Just4Wd", shared some background and we learm that the the fimmaker began writing his script in 2007, but they are not exactly independent. The Townsville Bulletin shares that by January 2010 the film was completed. The film's official website gives no clue to what happened to it over the last three years, but by the trailer it does appear something was shot. And though I am willing to believe IMDB that the thing is still in post-production and something may be released later this year... but pretty much, the lack of coverage shoots this one down. If the author wishes it back for continued work as user's draft, I say let him have it. It is far too premature for article space.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Incubate/Userfy as per previous comment. With this sort of film there's no guarantee when it will be released or if it will be released at all, or that it will be notable if it eventually creeps out on DVD, download, or TV.  And it's not currently meeting WP:NFILM. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Fine with incubation. As the film has a supposed 2012 release date, the article could benefit from collaborative editing away from mainspace.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Nick-D (talk) 02:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No definite release date; WP is not a newspaper and not a fortune cookie. When it has been released AND if it has established some notability, then it can have an article.  David_FLXD  (Talk) Review me 17:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.