Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blonde bombshell (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Considering who the nominator is I was tempted to supervote a redirect to Hell Freezes Over Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Blonde bombshell (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Nominating for deletion because it has no purpose, the only blue link listed is to an actress who was one of many referred to as a blonde bombshell.  D r e a m Focus  21:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC) withdrawing nomination since it might have a purpose now.  D r e a m Focus  03:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete since none of the other entries have pages. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination is invalid. There are more blue links there. I sugest the voters, befor voting, to refresh their knowledge of the rules related to disambiguation pages. The entries do not have to have pages; blue links suffice. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you plan on linking to every single person ever referred to as a blonde bombshell? What about redheaded bombshell?  I found a 66 year old news article with the headline mentioning a redheaded bombshell.  When people are looking for this term, would they be looking for any particular person called that?   D r e a m Focus  22:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Point taken. Persons removed. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * After a deliberation, point taken back: I've noticed that nicknames are valid items in the disambig pages, see eg Crazy Legs, Sparky, Sarge, or Doc for some. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This isn't Wikitionary. Redirect (and drop the disambiguation) to Bombshell (sex symbol). -- NINTENDUDE 64 22:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Dude, the redirect is already there, exactly as you like it. And you are right. This isn't wiktionary. This is disambiguation. Staszek Lem (talk)
 * Then Delete. -- NINTENDUDE 64 01:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note, if someone takes time to find sources proving the two films or the book is notable, and creates an article for it, then this page makes sense. Disambiguation pages exist to make certain people get the search results they want, so they don't end up in the wrong article instead.   D r e a m Focus  22:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note back; we have thousands of song and book titles in disambig pages without articles about these titles. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's because people will likely search for them. Is anything on the list something someone will likely search for by typing in "Blonde bombshell"?   D r e a m Focus  00:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (ec)Wonderful idea...cobble together subpar articles to save some disambiguation page. No, that's a terrible idea!  Just wait until the articles get created.  p  b  p  23:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bombshell or Bombshell (sex symbol) with no recreation precedent if the redlinks are created p  b  p  22:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Seeing as some of the redlinks have been solved, I'm striking my redirect vote p  b  p  21:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Give some time:The article needs some improvident (adding exact links, creating articles. Give some time. --Tito Dutta Message 02:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Doing some searching with my fancy new Highbeam account, I found some references, and created an article for the first formerly red link. The Blonde Bombshell I'll look through the others.   D r e a m Focus  03:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Note to closing administrator, I withdrew my nomination and changed my vote to Keep after doing some news searching, and finding enough coverage to create two new articles from two things on the list that were red linked. A third thing listed might have enough coverage (a lot of news results to sort through to determine that though) to have its own article as well.  New things have been added to the list also which some might actually search for.  The disambiguate page now has an actual purpose, aiding in navigation, helping people find what they are searching for when they enter this term.   D r e a m Focus  11:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Can we keep this now that the nom has been withdrawn? Bearian (talk) 16:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I considered closing it as withdrawn, but there are still Deletes on the board that haven't clearly been addressed, so I'm not inclined to close early. That being the case, I would say to keep it since it has obviously been fixed.   Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  20:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - now perfectly respectable dab page. Pam  D  21:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.