Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under WP:SNOW as a neologism first used the day before the article was created, with no references and no Ghits. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Blong

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Listed for speedy deletion, speedy denied as this is a neologism that is not obviously ridiculous. Procedural nomination. I have no opinion. KnightLago (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant promotion of an admitted neologism (coined yesterday, apparently), it's a shame this has to stay up for 7 days.  Maybe we can agree this doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being kept?  Powers T 12:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.