Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Covenant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  17:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Blood Covenant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

HUGE COI issue. Also, fails WP:RS. The talk page says the article creator has talked to the band members for the information presented in the article. Delete Undeath (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, this article contains a lot of OR. Undeath (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. They aren't even signed!  This fails WP:MUSIC horribly.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable, we don't even have the bandmembers' full names. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Falcon and NawlinWiki: fails WP:MUSIC. Cliff smith  talk  00:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  00:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: I'll improve this article, but it will last 2-3 weeks, so please give me time.(Deathmagnetic08 (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC))
 * Keep Give it a chance. AfDing a freshly written article that was made in good faith is exactly the kind of bull that disgusts me in Wikipedia. Give it time to be improved, if it is covered by the biggest Armenian metal site, there must be more info on it elsewhere. And the guy received permission to use that photo and he said that, why was it deleted? Shouldn't we be nice to newcomers? --Azure Shrieker (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * How do WE know that he recieved permission? I suggest you take a look at WP:OR. I gave it a chance before with PROD, but no changes were made to the article. They fail WP:BAND in every way. Until they release something notable, I doubt they will pass any requirement. Undeath (talk) 21:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Sigh. You're right; This is obviously going to get deleted. Oh well, maybe the band will get signed and become Encyclopedia-worthy in few years. --Azure Shrieker (talk) 07:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me explain you something. they are signed, but they don't belong to any label.they record, and their christian church finance them to release the album, i wrote "Unsigned" because i don't consider this a label. ah, one more thing, if i remove the unsourced information(segor's solo album,arbi's replacement,"religious differences" etc.), will this duscussion be over? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmagnetic08 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * They are not signed, and that is not a label. Plus, even if the church that is financing them was a label, it is non notable. The point is, you conducted a lot of original research to write this. They are not a notable band. Please read WP:OR, WP:BAND, and WP:RS. Undeath (talk) 23:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You didn't answered to my question if i remove the original research will this disscussion be over? and will you help me to rewrite this article to meet wikipedia quality standards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmagnetic08 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it won't be over. The band fails WP:MUSIC. I can't help that. They aren't even signed. Undeath (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * so what they are not signed?is it your goal of life to delete my articles?would it kill you if this article will not be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmagnetic08 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Calm down, please. Being signed is one of the criteria for notability at WP:MUSIC, (which I think at least 5 other people must have said already). Read the guideline, and don't attack other editors. Kafziel Complaint Department 08:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The band needs reliable sources that have written about it and consider it important. The web sites provided don't look like they meet the standards. If the band started to release albums on a major label, things would be different, per WP:MUSIC. Since the music is self-published on the web it is hard to know if the band has any actual listeners. EdJohnston (talk) 20:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V, not to mention WP:BAND. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.