Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Games (movie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Blood Games (movie)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Even with very specific search parameters, I'm not finding very many hits. The only actual websites I could find regarding this film are from unreliable sources such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. This film existed, but does not seem to have become a notable film. As a note, I've spun this off of the original bundled AfD, and only kept the comments pertaining to this show. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    21:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: The nominated stub was easy to begin fixing.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * alts for Blood Games:
 * director:
 * alt title:
 * Brazil:
 * Spain:
 * Hungary:
 * Hungary:
 * Potugal:
 * lead:
 * lead:


 * Keep Blood Games, at least. Here are two reliable-source reviews, and a brief but substantive discussion in an academic work, all found within the first few pages of a simple Google search for . --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. While a lack of BEFORE is sad, we do not judge stub because they have problems, we instead research as did (good job!), ad judge a topic per available sources even if not used. The article author REALLY needs to better understand MOS:FILM.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep But expand with sources. The reception section currently fails NPOV and presents someone's opinion as fact. Dimadick (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That issue has been dealt with.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Plenty of sources given now that have shown notability.  CatcherStorm    talk   09:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.