Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Has Been Shed

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 3 July 2005 03:09 (UTC)

Blood Has Been Shed
This is stupid, self-promoting article. move along nothing to seeehere. Alea yacta est. Project2501a 00:25, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

keep it there an amazing band you dicks. unsigned vote by  keep this is a valid article, just needs expanding. Not liking the band, or the name of the band is not reason enough for this article to go unsigned vote by 
 * Delete. By the way, you mean "promoting" and alea jacta est. ;) --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:27, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * it's 3:30 in the morning, standard greece time, i got a nasty php heizenbug and THERE'S NO DEBUGGER FOR PHP. Printf debugging is to fucking high-school!!! so yeah, i meant what you said. Project2501a 00:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; vanity. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 00:28, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Talk about not being notable... AngryParsley 00:30, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * OK. Well, it's kind of depressing really. I mean, I always wanted to be somebody, you know? And I.. oh, wait... --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:32, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; maybe - a quick google shows they are a real band but the page does need a heck of a good rewrite. Mariocki 00:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nobody cares about the existence of such a band. --webkid 18:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Nobodies, not worthy of an entry. Herrhav0k 14:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.