Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Libel (story)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:35, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Blood Libel (story)
The author is a friend, so my bias would naturally flow the other direction; however, an article on a short story which basically consists of a retelling of the short story isn't particularly encyclopedic; the story itself isn't particularly notable; it's hard to see that anything more than "read the story" can be made of this. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:33, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) lived. Thue | talk 20:40, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the story doesn't seem to be notable. We don't have articles on any story ever written, just as we don't have articles on any person who ever
 * Delete per Thue. carmeld1 01:22, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .