Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Reborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Blood Reborn

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I do not see anything notable about this game. There are no reliable VG source hits on it. Google hits are directory entries at best. — Hellknowz ▎talk 11:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Hellknowz  ▎talk 11:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – I could not find anything either. In fact, I tagged the article when I found out about this AFD at WP:VG/D (which the nomination was imcomplete; I completed). –MuZemike 14:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wooops, Twinkle failed me :( I didn't double check. — Hellknowz ▎talk 14:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this video game. Joe Chill (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete — No signif coverage.  m o n o   23:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge... which means make a mention of it in the original article because there's 1 sentence of content here. Shadowjams (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems that even this single sentence cannot be verified via a reliable source. Marasmusine (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fan-created games and "amateur recreations" are not notable unless they separately meet the requirements of WP:N, and no assertion of such is made in the article. &mdash;gorgan_almighty (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.