Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Red Shoes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The issues in the nomination have been addressed, no need for this AfD to run anymore. Tone 18:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Blood Red Shoes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing for notability, no references, a distinct lack of encyclopaedic style. It honestly appears like something set up/by a pub band for advertising. Cheers, Jonomacdrones  (talk)  03:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Keep - major overhaul: Nothing on the talkpage/suggestions for improvements by anyone else. Would have been slightly more helpful as opposed a tag for deletion. Feudonym (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed irrelevant and unsourced info, added lots of references, links, subheadings.
 * Rearranged to resemble a band article.
 * Added fact tags to help readers add references or later remove.
 * Does not look like an article for a pub band (not that it did anyway imho).
 * Notable due to the fact that they are signed to a major record label, with whom they've released 2 albums and 6 singles (a further 2 on an indie label), all of which have been fairly well-received in major publications, with multiple reviews and articles dating from 2006, and 3 of which have charted in the UK; have toured UK and Europe and headlined several festivals.
 * 28 articles link to this one which would all have to be deleted too (around 100 in all but that's not relevant here).

No one has mentioned anything, can the deletion tag be removed? Why hasn't Jonomacdrones done this yet and whose responsibility is this anyway, can anyone do it? Feudonym (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Clearly notable. Bringing this to AFD was somewhat ridiculous. WP:BEFORE obviously wasn't followed. Let's not waste more people's time on this discussion that could be better spent improving the encyclopedia.--Michig (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.