Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Stained: When No One Comes Looking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Blood Stained: When No One Comes Looking

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage. I couldn't even find a review. Outskirts Press is a self-publisher. SL93 (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I just checked the article creator's userpage and it says that they are a publicist for the author. I would have just prodded the article if I noticed that sooner. SL93 (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG   O n m yw a y 22   talk 15:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did find a source for the book but I figure that at most this can be mentioned in Maust's article. I created a section "in popular culture" to this end. It doesn't need its own article. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  18:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found just enough to justify a pop culture section in the article for Maust, but not enough to justify its own article. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  18:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I don't really think that it needs to be a search term. It's not that commonly searched, to be honest. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.