Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Stained Tradewind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 13:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Blood Stained Tradewind

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent reliable coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FILMNOT. Mdtemp (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: We do not judge a topic notability by an article lacking use of sources, but instead decide if sources are available, even if non-English.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:51, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The only source I can find is this book(113-114). Need another to meet the standard of WP:NFILM.--180.155.72.174 (talk) 10:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Well actually, the title appears to be discussed in muliple books, but I do not read Chinese.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Although the google book search gives nothing but a few passing mentions, the review by DVD Talk seems acceptable. --180.172.239.231 (talk) 06:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Please see my general observations on film notability in Hong Kong and China at the Articles for deletion/The Return of Wong Fei Hung discussion (minus the Andy Lau part at the end, which doesn't apply here). Philg88 ♦talk 09:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Original title:
 * Original title:
 * Original title:


 * Keep meets WP:NF through multiple results (even some in English) showing this title as making it into the permanent record for Chinese films. As long as it could be improved, there is no rush that this article must be improved, specially as English Wikipedia understands the problems inherent with sourcing non-English topics from the time when the internet was in its infancy.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Update: As actions speak louder (and can be more convincing) than words, this new article has being improved through regular editing. And apart from the books, I even found as quite decent 2007 review by DVD Talk... seventeen years after initial release. What say, nominator? Philg88? 180.155.72.174?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per . Meets film notability guidelines. Appears on all the main Chinese movie sites. Philg88 ♦talk 05:34, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:NFILM.   Jim Car ter  09:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.