Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood gatherer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 22:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Blood gatherer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another highly dubious piece of apparent nonsense and probable hoax. I can't quite see enough to justify the db-band my gut says it deserves - there are a few ghits, but not enough IMO to warrant keeping. —  iride  scent  19:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only sources are MySpace and similar, so the band certainly doesn't pass WP:MUSIC and I can't help thinking that "Hawk McLanaster, Esquire" doesn't sound like a particularly Romanian name, which leads me to think that this just may be a hoax. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Tssk, surely you're not doubting the good faith of the creator here? (When I see articles like this staying live for a whole month, it makes me feel all warm inside.) —  iride  scent  19:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- "Hawk McLanaster" returns precisely zero Google hits and "Blood gatherer" is impossible to discern from a host of other dark fantasy stuff... fails WP:BAND, doesn't meet WP:Notable. Although I'm sure he's from a fine old Transylvanian family... the MySpace page lists two upcoming Romanian gigs, with entry prices quoted in lek, unless they're a hoax too.  Accounting4Taste 20:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Typo. My fault, it's "Hawk McLancaster."  I'm sure those reliable sources will show up on google with the correct spelling... no, not so much. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. LOL I was fooled by FisherQueen!!  That'll teach me not to Google from the AfD but to use the article itself.  And yes, the correct spelling yields nothing except MySpace and blogs with content surprisingly similar to the article here.  Still nothing notable.  But now I know there's room in the music world for a Hawk McLanaster... Accounting4Taste 21:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. DrFluffy  21:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube 22:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete most likly a hoax and even if they're not they still fail WP:MUSIC TonyBallioni 01:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - could probably be a speedy, really, as there's no real notability expressed in the article itself. As it is, I can't see any indication they pass WP:MUSIC unless the Transylvanian media is just not online yet... Tony Fox (arf!) 07:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.