Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodlet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Bloodlet
Does not meet WP:MUSIC, or at least we don't know that it does. Delete. --worthawholebean talkcontribs 02:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:MUSIC. Maybe we could have given a new user more than one minute to establish that. Kappa 02:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. Imaginaryoctopus(talk) 06:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup, the language is demotic rather than neutral. -- (aeropagitica)  07:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and a major cleanup. --Terence Ong Talk 08:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Minorly Notable B.ellis 15:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keep and cleanup. Good heavens, they just want to delete every band/artist article they don't think is worthy and it seems as if some people will twist the rules and take them out of context to do so. --TaeKwonTimmy 04:33, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. notable enough. Kingturtle 08:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.