Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodsilk spider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Bloodsilk spider

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Dungeons & Dragons monster of minimal notability or importance. Minimal in-game coverage, no evidence of third party coverage. Article does not mention any sources, third party or otherwise. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dgf32 (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with the appropriate article; not in of itself notable enough to justify an article here. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — non-notable. Unsourced. Mention in a list. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   —Gavin Collins (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just one of thousands of non-notable stock characters with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — non-notable. just another variation of commonly found real-world critter used for D&D. shadzar-talk 21:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - near the bottom of the barrel in notability here. --John Nagle (talk) 20:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.