Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodsport 4: The Dark Kumite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Bloodsport 4: The Dark Kumite

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources for this that shows notability on 2 Google searches, Rotten Tomatoes, and Movie Review Query Engine. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 23:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is part of a notable series of films, albeit perhaps a sign of how low the series can go.Eauhomme (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Being part of a notable series doesn't make it notable. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 16:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That's counterintuitive. The fact that it is an official sequel and part of a notable series would most certainly make it notable. If the movie series is deemed notable then all movies within it are inherently notable. --SmashvilleBONK! 16:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It has to be notable by itself so the article needs reliable sources. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 20:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Read WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NF. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 20:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ignore the guidelines for a minute and just use common sense. It's an official sequel to a notable movie whether or not anyone actually saw it. --SmashvilleBONK! 13:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 19:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Again, ignore all rules and use common sense. --SmashvilleBONK! 22:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This isn't a WP:IAR issue. You have your opinions, and I have mine. It has nothing to do with common sense. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep or Merge to Bloodsport (film) so as to keep series all together.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge. Not really notable but generally verifiable and with a reasonably clear parent article.  Alternately all three sequels could be merged into a single Bloodsport (film series) article.  Eluchil404 (talk) 05:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a direct-to-video movie so it's hard to find reviews from reliable sources. I've added a TV Guide review. Part of a series and features several notable actors so probably deserves its own article like the rest of the series. Gets about 37,000 hits on Google!!! miniluv (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That's 37.000 hits for "bloodsport 4" and 24.000 for "bloodsport IV"!! This movie goes by several names. miniluv (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, there is THIS and THIS. Want to dig for a RS reviw, or shall I?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.